LET US CLING TO THE OLD SCIENCE TILL MODERN SCIENCE CLEARS OUR SUSPICION OF ITS ILLEGITIMATE GIFT TO FEMINISM IN THE SCIENCE OF REPRODUCTION Written by KEMKA S. IBEJI

In Philosophy of the Sciences, a school of thought led by Karl Popper held that the methodology of the sciences is "Conjectures and Refutations". 

But in a general consideration of philosophical methods, we recall a vibrant philosophical methodology called Dialects. Most Philosophy Scholars refer to this method as the Socratic Method. But as an African Philosopher who has the right foundation of Philosophy and have joined the unraveling of the truth of Africa as the cradle of Philosophy and, inferentially or consequently, civilization, I do not bless the crime of Western Philosophy and their jaundiced history with attributing or ascribing that revered philosophical methodology to an intellectual thief as Socrates. No! I therefore prefer to deal with DIALECTICS.

So in Dialects, and attending to the application of philosophical super methodologies on the sciences, our intellectual surge adopts a logico mathematical super saunter that moves from thesis, through antithesis to synthesis which turns into thesis and continues the foray.

Most armchair critics and intellectual inferiors of Philosophy and Philosophers will quibble that such philosophy will plunge knowledge into the crisis of infinite regress. It is for the reasons of continuous change in assumed realities that the philosophical school of skepticism came into existence. They asked that all judgements should be suspended as knowledge, for them, remains a continuum. 

Be that as it may, without the status of Philosophers as the gadfly of all disciplines, of course their offsprings, the scientific world would have misled humanity. Imagine if we held, without prodding further, that the earth was flat? The movement of scientific stance from geocentrism to heliocentrism would have never happened without the duty of Philosophers as the gadfly.

Once again, we recall that science serves civilization and civilization is led by politics. To this end I call to question the turn of scientific truth which moved the gender responsibility of the offsprings from the mother to the father. I vehemently aver that the logic of such assertion and scientific affirmation is invalid and in dire need of reinvestigation, regutation or corroboration. 

In the main however, I strongly believe that the sciences as the handmade of time and diplomatic reign has played the cards of the west on the reproduction understanding turning the gave of truth, forcefully, towards feminism. This I, most humbly, puntificate that the conjecture of the X and Y chromosomes and their play on genderisation of the offspring by modern science is vulgar charity to feminist agenda.

To argue this fact into truth, I therefore challenge the scientific world to objectively reinvestigate, reappraise and reexamine that stand on the modes of participation of the X and Y chromosomes on the results of copulation with special consideration of the play of the acidity of the environment consisting of the fallopian tube, the ovaries, the uterus and the virginal walls. In recast therefore, let the world of reproduction science return to that submission for reassessment and reconfirmation with the knowledge that acidity within the purview of concern has a way of impacting the Y chromosome its efficacy on the race of life.