Posts

Showing posts from February, 2020

WHETHER LOGIC, MATHEMATICS OR THE LAW; IMO SUPREME COURT REVIEW HAS MERIT AND THE SCALE IS HERE PONTIFICATED. By KEMKA S. IBEJI

Image
KEMKA S. IBEJI  If justice enjoys safety in the hands of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, I will stake my most treasured asset for this; Rt. Hon. Emeka Ihedioha has a good case, very valid and sound argument and so the judgment will tilt to his side on Monday 2nd March, 2020. Two (2) factors grant Emeka Ihedioha's case the desired and requires merits; A. The issue of spread was overlooked and omitted in the judgment. When the Supreme Court in her judgment asserted that Sen. Hope Uzodinma having polled the highest number of votes cast and having met the statutory requirement of spread is therefore returned as the winner, it failed to consider the veracity of her premises granting the conclusion. In logic however, only true premises can give true conclusions. For every valid statement therefore, the premises and conclusion must be either true (through and through) or false all through. No valid argument has false premises and true concl

The Supreme Court has no Difficulty Anymore. Written by KEMKA S. IBEJI

Image
KEMKA S. IBEJI  It won't be difficult to remove Sen. Hope Uzodinma but it will be difficult to return Rt. Hon. Emeka Ihedioha. No one among them has won the election. Though Rt. Hon Emeka Ihedioha would have been said to be nearer to victory than Sen. Hope Uzodinma, there is no nearness to reality. The proclamation of the law in the instance operates exclusively within two-valued Logic. So it is either true or false and no middle ground. None of the two had won yet and the Supreme Court knows this, at least now if they never knew so. The points are very clear; 1. Rt. Hon. Emeka Ihedioha did not win according to the statutory requirement of the spread being the 25% of ⅔ of the 27 LGAs of Imo State. His announcement was a farce. It was a full case of *runoff* 2. It may have not been reasoned or imagined by the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that there can be 70 candidates in an election as such even while they were creating political parties like sands. Nob

PREMISES AND CONCLUSION TOWARDS IMO SUPREME COURT REVIEW: MNEMONICS FROM BAYELSA SUPREME COURT REVIEW. Written by KEMKA S. IBEJI

Image
KEMKA S. IBEJI  For those who think the Imo Supreme Court is done and dusted upon the debacle of the APC outing today should read the lines below. The following snippets from the trashing of the APC/Lyon's call for review today is worthy of consideration ; ...the applicants failed to point out errors, stating that the judgment is final for all ages. #JSC ...vexatious, frivolous, and constituted a gross abuse of court process. #JSC ...granting the applications would open a floodgate for the review of decisions of the Supreme Court. #JSC ...the applications amount to an invitation for the apex court to sit in appeal on its earlier judgment in violation of the Constitution. #PDP Counsel The common take home from the proclamation of the Supreme Court today are; 1. Approaching the Supreme Court for review of her judgment is not unlawful and unconstitutional 2. There are conditions under which the Supreme Court can be prayed for a reconsideration of her own judgment

A 2ND FILING FOR REVIEW WILL CRUMBLE THE NIGERIAN JUDICIARY: SUPREME COURT BEWARE! By KEMKA S. IBEJI

Supreme Court of Nigeria should save herself the huge embarrassment by reversing the Imo State Governorship Election judgement to something else between a supplementary election in the 388 polling units/ a rerun in the 388 polling units and cancelled polling units/ or a full runoff between the top 2 candidates. The bigger embarrassment will come when there is filing for a review the 2nd time. Trust Gov. Emeka Ihedioha he will go it infinitely. He knows the truth and he will pure it to the end of this earth. He will bring his case to the world stage for all to see. He has the language, the knowledge, the wisdom, the courage, the zeal, the support of his people and most of all the legitimacy to push on. He will bring the judiciary to the muds and make it an object to laughter to clowns. This will crumble the judiciary and put the entire Nigeria in grave mess. Don't dare him! I bet you, Gov. Emeka Ihedioha will ask for more reviews if the Supreme Court fails to do justice in this

IMO: THE DEN OF DESPERATE POLITICIANS. By KEMKA S. IBEJI

The losses of desperation; Uche Nwosu (Rochas Okorocha) and Sen. Godwin Ararume. Let me begin by reenacting the moral maxim that "anyone who has nothing to die for, has no reason to live". The above is all about character. It is a virtue of inestimable value. This is strongly lacking in Nigerian political class and especially as seen in Imo State in the recent experience. In the last general election of 2019, Imo State witnessed a large number of aspirants turnout. While many political analysts and commentators may wish to condemn that, I very sincerely commend it. My reason is that it shows a very growing level of political awareness, education, involvement and concern. This also implies that the number of citizenship is heightening in Imo State. One will recall that the cradle of the state system is the Greek political experience through City States and the polis. For the Greek political thinkers, to be a citizen is to be involved in the leadership of the land. It is

APPLYING ELEMENTARY LOGIC TO THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT OF THE CASE OF GOV. EMEKA IHEDIOHA AND GOV. HOPE UZODINMA. ON THE SCALE OF THE LAWS OF THOUGHT: LAW OF IDENTITY AND THE LAW OF EXCLUDED MIDDLE. Written by KEMKA S. IBEJI

Image
KEMKA S. IBEJI  I was attracted to this discourse by the words "using the common sense approach to common law" as used by my brother Endy Ezenwata somewhere while he adduced reason to what he thinks should happen at the Supreme Court on the review of Ihedioha and Uzodinma case. One will be right like him in arguing that the Supreme Court judgment on Uche Nwosu's matter on dual nomination has little or nothing to do with Sen. Hope Uzodinma but not totally. Such argument will be right to the extent of advising the PDP not to have that as their only point when approaching the Supreme Court for a review but I will also assure my readers that if it were a place where justice is the crux and concern, the point is mature enough to disqualify Sen. Hope Uzodinma. Of course, the PDP wouldn't have argued that at the Tribunal and Appeal courts because the judgement hasn't come by then. The Supreme Court ruled on that few days or weeks before the Ihedioha judgmen